12 years;” the “Oh no, don’t test my child with PCR, let him die of unknown reason” is not what a decent parent is going to say. If your candidate has an obvious flaw – corruption or cowardice or multiple mistresses – you get in first and launch advertisements claiming accusing your opponent of immorality or cowardice or whatever. people were buying plaquenil in tons from the drugstore. but why, oh why, you didn’t make clinical trial worthy of its name from the start, that could answer permanently Yes or No, the HCQ has effects, why did you keep in your niche paper … I know all your studies on Rickettsies, I know all your studies on maxivirus etc so I know your science well established, you knew very well that by publishing those “pseudo” trial, “pseudo clinical trial”, there were not acceptable by anyone, when we end up on a publication with 6 patients (he had 23, perhaps 6 in one group), we know very well that this i not a clinical trial, so why did you not do this clinical trial, it all bothers us” … You can see where it’s going”, The answer, I’ll let you translate it yourself though google, this is the word for word answer of Raoult on why he didn’t do a “clinical trial worthy of its name”: (added words to ease translation in parenthesis). And only after Raoult denounced controls and other basics of clinical research as unethical. Could Anthony Fauci explain why the investigators of the NIAID remdesivir trial did change the primary outcome during the course of the project (16th April)? source : https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Hydroxychloroquine_final_DOI_IJAA.pdf But what about the treatment itself? Réponse aux interrogations concernant la qualification de nos travaux médicaux.https://t.co/KexHdTNM8i. Pr Perronne, auteur de “Il y a t-il une erreur qu’ILS n’ont pas commise” au micro d'André Bercoff sur Sud Radio After 4 months of closely following the Covid-19 fight in general and HCq in particular, it appears to me that ZINC is critical to the effective use of HCQ. It’s illegal : cf https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&idArticle=LEGIARTI000025457542. Required fields are marked *. I really don’t get this argument that “urgency of the situation excuses some of it”. Didier Raoult sur CNEWS 15/02/21 - YouTube Fake news“. “You would fall for the same scam” is hardly a conclusive argument. 7 were here. In Morocco and South Korea the same protocol has proven extremely efficient with lowest mortality rates in the world. https://t.co/zI8MgsfHlx. Outside of Raoult’s alternative reality, clinical data from France, Sweden, Brazil and USA already now shows that chloroquine not only does not work against COVID-19, it seems to even kill. Seen from France he was a visionary that refuse this stupid general confinement and that very early asker fot the TTT’s way of the South Korea. Not just this. And Raoult is completely right. Découvrez nos offres, Aix : leur métier, nettoyeurs... de scènes de crime. In 11% of patients QTc increased to >500 ms, representing high risk group for arrhythmia. Raoult was possibly made to resign his job, he was cited to go to China already this summer. That would be apples and oranges. An association of increased overall mortality was identified in patients treated with hydroxychloroquine alone.”. Like these copy-pasted disease-spreading ticks, or these copy-pasted fraud-spreading gel bands, newly discovered at IHU: P Renesto, P Dehoux, E Gouin, L Touqui, P Cossart, D Raoult Identification and Characterization of a Phospholipase D–Superfamily Gene in Rickettsiae J Infect Dis (2003) doi: 10.1086/379080 Also “lanes two and three show concerning similarities.“. Here is a study done in Spain. If somebody has a hint that something might be working based on observation, then it should be presented that way. HCQ is an antiviral. The development of acute renal failure but not baseline QTc was a strong predictor of extreme QTc prolongation.”. Please try to explain it away…but it sounds like a darn good prophylaxis. Those which do not fit his general world view, are all flawed or outright fraudulent. Vidéo - Pr Raoult : "Les mesures sociales qui sont prises pour contrôler l'épidémie n'ont pas d'effet sur le coronavirus" It appears the author has an axe to grind here…Me? As a reminder IFR = deaths / all infections (including the asymptomatics, undiagnosed etc.). This is not true. About Dr Barraud alias fluidloading (which never denied to be Dr Barraud), here is most of his attacks on Pr Raoult, look at this link, http://www.noelshack.com/2020-17-3-1587558555-r-barraud.png. Le 24 juin dernier, Didier Raoult était longuement auditionné par l’Assemblée nationale. This guy has been trolling science for years. Donc, c’est pas vrai, c’est de l’intox, c’est pas vrai et ça disparaîtra comme c’est apparu il y a une vingtaine d’année, c’est de l’intox, je vous suggère d’ailleurs plutôt que… vous avez qu’à le lire car c’est intelligent, sur la version de wikipedia en anglais, vous avez qu’à lire, vous verrez qu’il y a la moité qui dit “voilà il faut faire des essais randomisés” et l’autre moitié qui dit “voilà pourquoi il ne faut pas en faire” et vous verrez que je ne suis pas isolé dans ce monde et que d’ailleurs tous les gens qui ont critiqués ça, je le redit, d’ailleurs et il faut le lire et il faut écouter ce que je dit, tous les gens qui ont critiqué ça n’ont publié que des essais comparatifs non randomisés, il n’y a pas un essai français randomisé comparatif, il n’y a pas même un essai français qui ait le degrée d’isolement des stratégies thérapeutique comme le notre, zéro. Si vous êtes obligés d’avoir dix mille personnes dans un essai pour montrer une significativité c’est qu’il n’y a aucune différences, parce que je vais vous dire, il y a quinze pour-cent des gens qui ne prennent même pas les médicaments que l’on leur prescrit, quand vous cherchez une différence de 1%, vous n’êtes plus dans de la médecine, vous êtes dans du fantasme méthodologique donc tout essai qui comporte plus de mille personnes est un essai qui cherche à démontrer quelque chose qui n’existe pas et je suis désolé mais c’est une des bases de la statistique et je vous assure que je suis un très bon méthodologiste, donc c’est du fantasme qu’on vous répète… qu’on répète à tour de bras qui est véhiculée par des gens qui sont des méthodologistes qui ne comprennent rien à la science. Unfortunately a (supposed) lie can’t be fought with another lie, but with the truth. The online article was swiftly deleted, but here is a backup. La méthodologie n’est pas de la science, c’est un outil de la science, cela n’a rien avoir (ce n’est pas la même chose). I quoted a bit of the french parlement investigation on coronavirus crisis handling in France and Raoult answered some question, the very last one (question): “the question I ask myself and I’m not the only one to ask it (start doubting tone like he already knows the answer), And what now? In that recent preprint, where Raoult claimed to have cured with chloroquine over 1000 patients mildly or barely suffering from COVID-19 (including children), he counted 5 levels of evidence that his method works. Only one molecule difference, but vastly different properties. Tell us more of this “Wuhan methodology”. We can see all those greedy for popularity wanna be expert doctors with over 10+ years in their field and nowhere on the level of Raoult showing up in ALL medias on a daily basis, criticizing his work. The microbiologist Raoult is director of the Institut hospitalo-universitaire en maladies infectieuses de Marseille (IHU Méditerranée Infection) and its URMITE department, which was previously funded by the French research networks CNRS and INSERM. And while we’re at it, the author doesn’t seem to understand that chloroquine is not the same as HCQ. Convince me that it exists! Unless completely made-up fraud, there is only one way to explain it: For controls, Daowen et al lied about baseline treatment because serious scientists outside of China tend to laugh at TCM. At the moment we don’t have any treatment that is efficient for covid-19. PS it doesn’t matter if they were in the “control” group or not, they were part of the study. ): Un manuscrit dont la publication devrait faire parler : expérimentation de la bithérapie HCQ+AZ au Brésil. "Jean-Paul Moatti is the husband of Yolande Obadia, who is president of the IHU Mediterranee Infection foundation. The study made all the big news, maybe because it was the first one from the US. He even treated 14 year old children with chloroquine as part of his 1000 patients trial (Table 1 here, recruitment age was >12 years old), which is actually quite illegal. It is all very surreal. I look forward to seeing their paper once it is published. What do they have in common? Scientists understand this, but the media is hoping readers won’t. To be updated, proper randomized controlled clinical trials on chloroquine against COVID-19 are ongoing and might soon deliver results. Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected, you can see where this is going. The blame for thousands, if not millions, of covid-19 deaths will soon become abundantly clear being laid upon these two groups of ideoligists referenced above. Mean through blood concentration of hydroxychloroquine was 678 ng/mL (range: 381–891) at days 3–7 after treatment initiation. The safest way to successfully heal with witchdoctor magic is to treat those who are not really ill and recover anyway. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. The author is a cartoonist. Raoult treats patients who come to IHU-Marseille, therefore statistically more motivated by symptoms than in the Pasteur survey. Meanwhile, in USA, an NIH Expert Panel, convened by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (directed by US epidemics expert Anthony Fauci), recommended in its COVID-19 guidelines on 21 April 2020: “Except in the context of a clinical trial, the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends against the use of the following drugs for the treatment of COVID-19: – The combination of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (AIII) because of the potential for toxicities.”. Where did you hear that? Independent Science Journalist and Cartoonist. Raoult says this is good science. Vous avez trouvé sur notre site internet un contenu ou un message manifestement illicite et/ou portant atteinte à la dignité humaine ? The idea is to kill the virus. Eh? Tide is turning for the media-savvy French professor Didier Raoult and his chloroquine, even US President Donald Trump is suddenly barely even mentioning the miracle drug for COVID-19. In this double-blinded phase IIb clinical trial, all patients were treated just as Raoult says, with hydroxychloroquine+azithromycine only, without those evil controls Raoult hates? Its all the same. En publiant un commentaire vous acceptez la réglementation en vigueur. Just adding for the record that despite his own exclusion criteria Pr Raoult did enroll 10 y/o children, for which there is a 3 years jail sentence + 45k euros fine. This horrendous ethics breach passed peer review at Elsevier with flying colours. Raoult is aping not only Trump’s language of “witchhunting” and “fake news”, but also his deployment of tactical hypocrisy. Who cares, it will sure pass peer review in one of Elsevier journals Raoult controls. 25/02/2020 – “Before we can influence mortality statistics in France, things will have to change a lot” in his “Coronavirus: a risk of pandemic?” video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuE5CA6yB-Y), I could also quote him on his “visions” about the climate but it’s out of his scope of proficiency. And anyway, Raoult and his colleagues “deemed it ethically unacceptable to conduct a therapeutic trial“. Enrolling them if enough to violate the law even if they are part of the control group, since in a normal study groups are randomized and nor the doctors nor the patients know who is in which group. Millions of people have been taking this drug for malaria in the past decades. If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Practically, every country in the world monitors a number of active cases and death associated with COVID-19, and these statistics are updated several times daily. I can’t insert graphics here. On 24 April Raoult and his IHU issued another press release or a white paper, where they openly accused their Paris colleagues Mahevas et al of “scientific fraud“, already in the headline. Wow… from the moment you confuse cloroquine with hydroxycloroquine, everything you have written becomes invalid. excuse me in Greece we do not apply such protocol. Learn how your comment data is processed. However you don’t address the flawed Veterans study that Raoult criticizes, which is way worse than his studies on all points. Are you saying that Raoult is a fraud, Zelenko is a fraud, South Dakota is a fraud, the country of Bahrain is a fraud, along with 1000’s of doctors around the world? ISAC (and then the publisher Elsevier) insist however that the peer review process “did adhere to the industry’s peer review rules.” Which is strange, since it seems the paper was reviewed and sent back for minor revision on the same day it was submitted. 48 of these allegedly received HCQ. La vidéo a été réuploadée par France Soir, vous pouvez la voir à ce lien : sur France Soir n ous allons rapidement la télécharger sur de nouvelles plateformes d’hébergement « . https://t.co/hxZyUjf8vW. De linke weekendbijlage (17-2020) - Kloptdatwel? Jhnny99, with respect, by definition lethality is the capacity to cause death, whereas mortality is the number of deaths from a particular cause. You mentioned above at ” Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected……”. just published a couple of days ago. Bik found even more irregularities in his papers, which makes sense: a bullying and totalitarian research environment with a personality cult, where compliance and fear rule, can only produce unreliable or falsified research. The “great scientist” believes in his delirium to be actually just like a World War I general, commanding thousands of men to get out the trenches and die for the glory of France. Now, the preprint by the Tongji cardiologist Wang Daowen and colleagues claims all 568 patients received “baseline treatments [..] of antiviral drugs (Lopinavir and Ritonavir, Entecavir hydrate, or Ribavirin)“. Didier Raoult a réagi sur Twitter aujourd’hui, jeudi 10 septembre, déclarant : « Mon bulletin scientifique de mardi a été censuré par Youtube, décision confirmée après appel. Is Frontiers a potential predatory publisher? The object of Raoult’s public wrath is now Bik whom he describes as “witchhunter”, as well as this study from Veterans Affair hospitals in USA: Joseph Magagnoli, Siddharth Narendran, Felipe Pereira, Tammy Cummings, James W Hardin, S Scott Sutton, Jayakrishna Ambati Outcomes of hydroxychloroquine usage in United States veterans hospitalized with Covid-19 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920. Its amazing how trite and condescending a human can become. Making huge profit out of this crisis by big pharma and their corrupted allies is the sole motive! Raoult doesn’t talk about that study. Its clearly to early to use data and studies. That was sure something unexpected for Raoult, after the President of France, Emmanuel Macron, has visited his lab just days before and described Raoult as “great scientist”. Avec une confirmation cette fois qu'aucun consentement n'a été demandé. Look at the data please. Control group was treated with azithromycin.Nearly dying patients with lymphopenia were treated with hydroxychloroquine.Fraudulent study. He just healed patients that were showing up at his hospital, he wasn’t in a clinical trial and never was. This page is lying. Vous devez être connecté pour intéragir. In his paper Gautret et al TMID 2020 Raoult admitted that his thousands of patients were kept in the dark about the risks, since none of them received a patient information sheet and an informed consent to sign: “There is no formal consent to sign in our institution by patients“. You mean BFM TV let people think he was a visionary. This article has been updated several times since it was first published. Really, he does: First paper showing a significant effect of hydroxychloroquine on the fatality rate of severe forms of COVID-19.Attenuation of the inflammatory cytokine storm? Well, Let’s look at Costa Rica, and their death rate. You seem to be a great analyst. Les champs marqués d'un « * » sont obligatoires. They gave all patients that were in the most critical state HCQ and then they conclude that HCQ increases deaths. Moreover, this depends on the amount of tests performed, so unreliable. The French newspaper Entreprendre cited his letter to Robert Lafont, the CEO of this publishing house. Enter your email address to follow For Better Science and receive notifications of new posts by email. That study, and a mysterious manuscript from Detroit submitted to NEJM, are discussed by Derek Lowe here. He treated older patients who had clear symptoms, and few were subsequently hospitalized and almost none died. I was indeed recruited as Professor by the Peking University (PUHSC), the most renowned medical school in the country, which happens to be very advanced in the field of virology. We need to prevent the Cytokine storm. Chaque semaine, l’infectiologue s’exprime pendant quelques minutes au sujet de l’épidémie. Period. So now Raoult endorses Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) as a chloroquine adjuvant. Les Differentes Techniques D'animation Commerciale, Les Occasions Du Lareinty, Vélo Route Cyclotourisme, Star Wars Le Pouvoir De La Force Steam, Oreiller Wopilo Ou Simba, Les Adjectifs Qualificatifs, Cycle De Vie Produit Touristique, Nombre D'habitants Erstein 2020, Hôtel Avec Salle De Réunion, Lac Guichard Rando, Zone Interdite Changer De Vie 2/2 Replay, " />

vannes et ses environs

Le fait, pour toute personne, de présenter à LaProvence.com un contenu ou activité comme illicite dans le but d'en obtenir le retrait ou d'en faire cesser Avec "La Provence" ce mardi : métiers d'art, un patrimoine toujours vivant ! Raoult et la Chloroquine : les failles 22 mars 2020 Par Olivier_Belli Dans le club Raoult is right. That’s the difference here. The media and AMA doesn’t seem to want you to hear about it. This is why chloroquine proponents changed their stance and now scream that it is wrong to treat very sick COVID-19 patients with chloroquine. If you want a smoking gun, start with who makes money where. Instead, he lets his loyal bootlickers attack his critics. Leonid Schneider is creating Independent Science Journalism. Instead, they insist that the drug must be given very early during infection or even prophylactically, i.e., to healthy and asymptomatic people only. Seen from France on April, 25, there does not seem to be an HQ miracle. pic.twitter.com/8zAsTqRN5a. Le professeur marseillais, Didier Raoult intervenait ce matin sur Cnews. This medicin is approved for people with lupus and reuma. The entire IHU plays his game like a devout doomsday cult on hallucinogenic drugs. You also write that Hydroxycloroquine doesnt work, there’s not a hint of evidence of that. Once again minors cannot be included in a study unless they cannot be replaced by adults. see page 6 for inclusion criteria : “two primary criteria: i) age >12 years;” the “Oh no, don’t test my child with PCR, let him die of unknown reason” is not what a decent parent is going to say. If your candidate has an obvious flaw – corruption or cowardice or multiple mistresses – you get in first and launch advertisements claiming accusing your opponent of immorality or cowardice or whatever. people were buying plaquenil in tons from the drugstore. but why, oh why, you didn’t make clinical trial worthy of its name from the start, that could answer permanently Yes or No, the HCQ has effects, why did you keep in your niche paper … I know all your studies on Rickettsies, I know all your studies on maxivirus etc so I know your science well established, you knew very well that by publishing those “pseudo” trial, “pseudo clinical trial”, there were not acceptable by anyone, when we end up on a publication with 6 patients (he had 23, perhaps 6 in one group), we know very well that this i not a clinical trial, so why did you not do this clinical trial, it all bothers us” … You can see where it’s going”, The answer, I’ll let you translate it yourself though google, this is the word for word answer of Raoult on why he didn’t do a “clinical trial worthy of its name”: (added words to ease translation in parenthesis). And only after Raoult denounced controls and other basics of clinical research as unethical. Could Anthony Fauci explain why the investigators of the NIAID remdesivir trial did change the primary outcome during the course of the project (16th April)? source : https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Hydroxychloroquine_final_DOI_IJAA.pdf But what about the treatment itself? Réponse aux interrogations concernant la qualification de nos travaux médicaux.https://t.co/KexHdTNM8i. Pr Perronne, auteur de “Il y a t-il une erreur qu’ILS n’ont pas commise” au micro d'André Bercoff sur Sud Radio After 4 months of closely following the Covid-19 fight in general and HCq in particular, it appears to me that ZINC is critical to the effective use of HCQ. It’s illegal : cf https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&idArticle=LEGIARTI000025457542. Required fields are marked *. I really don’t get this argument that “urgency of the situation excuses some of it”. Didier Raoult sur CNEWS 15/02/21 - YouTube Fake news“. “You would fall for the same scam” is hardly a conclusive argument. 7 were here. In Morocco and South Korea the same protocol has proven extremely efficient with lowest mortality rates in the world. https://t.co/zI8MgsfHlx. Outside of Raoult’s alternative reality, clinical data from France, Sweden, Brazil and USA already now shows that chloroquine not only does not work against COVID-19, it seems to even kill. Seen from France he was a visionary that refuse this stupid general confinement and that very early asker fot the TTT’s way of the South Korea. Not just this. And Raoult is completely right. Découvrez nos offres, Aix : leur métier, nettoyeurs... de scènes de crime. In 11% of patients QTc increased to >500 ms, representing high risk group for arrhythmia. Raoult was possibly made to resign his job, he was cited to go to China already this summer. That would be apples and oranges. An association of increased overall mortality was identified in patients treated with hydroxychloroquine alone.”. Like these copy-pasted disease-spreading ticks, or these copy-pasted fraud-spreading gel bands, newly discovered at IHU: P Renesto, P Dehoux, E Gouin, L Touqui, P Cossart, D Raoult Identification and Characterization of a Phospholipase D–Superfamily Gene in Rickettsiae J Infect Dis (2003) doi: 10.1086/379080 Also “lanes two and three show concerning similarities.“. Here is a study done in Spain. If somebody has a hint that something might be working based on observation, then it should be presented that way. HCQ is an antiviral. The development of acute renal failure but not baseline QTc was a strong predictor of extreme QTc prolongation.”. Please try to explain it away…but it sounds like a darn good prophylaxis. Those which do not fit his general world view, are all flawed or outright fraudulent. Vidéo - Pr Raoult : "Les mesures sociales qui sont prises pour contrôler l'épidémie n'ont pas d'effet sur le coronavirus" It appears the author has an axe to grind here…Me? As a reminder IFR = deaths / all infections (including the asymptomatics, undiagnosed etc.). This is not true. About Dr Barraud alias fluidloading (which never denied to be Dr Barraud), here is most of his attacks on Pr Raoult, look at this link, http://www.noelshack.com/2020-17-3-1587558555-r-barraud.png. Le 24 juin dernier, Didier Raoult était longuement auditionné par l’Assemblée nationale. This guy has been trolling science for years. Donc, c’est pas vrai, c’est de l’intox, c’est pas vrai et ça disparaîtra comme c’est apparu il y a une vingtaine d’année, c’est de l’intox, je vous suggère d’ailleurs plutôt que… vous avez qu’à le lire car c’est intelligent, sur la version de wikipedia en anglais, vous avez qu’à lire, vous verrez qu’il y a la moité qui dit “voilà il faut faire des essais randomisés” et l’autre moitié qui dit “voilà pourquoi il ne faut pas en faire” et vous verrez que je ne suis pas isolé dans ce monde et que d’ailleurs tous les gens qui ont critiqués ça, je le redit, d’ailleurs et il faut le lire et il faut écouter ce que je dit, tous les gens qui ont critiqué ça n’ont publié que des essais comparatifs non randomisés, il n’y a pas un essai français randomisé comparatif, il n’y a pas même un essai français qui ait le degrée d’isolement des stratégies thérapeutique comme le notre, zéro. Si vous êtes obligés d’avoir dix mille personnes dans un essai pour montrer une significativité c’est qu’il n’y a aucune différences, parce que je vais vous dire, il y a quinze pour-cent des gens qui ne prennent même pas les médicaments que l’on leur prescrit, quand vous cherchez une différence de 1%, vous n’êtes plus dans de la médecine, vous êtes dans du fantasme méthodologique donc tout essai qui comporte plus de mille personnes est un essai qui cherche à démontrer quelque chose qui n’existe pas et je suis désolé mais c’est une des bases de la statistique et je vous assure que je suis un très bon méthodologiste, donc c’est du fantasme qu’on vous répète… qu’on répète à tour de bras qui est véhiculée par des gens qui sont des méthodologistes qui ne comprennent rien à la science. Unfortunately a (supposed) lie can’t be fought with another lie, but with the truth. The online article was swiftly deleted, but here is a backup. La méthodologie n’est pas de la science, c’est un outil de la science, cela n’a rien avoir (ce n’est pas la même chose). I quoted a bit of the french parlement investigation on coronavirus crisis handling in France and Raoult answered some question, the very last one (question): “the question I ask myself and I’m not the only one to ask it (start doubting tone like he already knows the answer), And what now? In that recent preprint, where Raoult claimed to have cured with chloroquine over 1000 patients mildly or barely suffering from COVID-19 (including children), he counted 5 levels of evidence that his method works. Only one molecule difference, but vastly different properties. Tell us more of this “Wuhan methodology”. We can see all those greedy for popularity wanna be expert doctors with over 10+ years in their field and nowhere on the level of Raoult showing up in ALL medias on a daily basis, criticizing his work. The microbiologist Raoult is director of the Institut hospitalo-universitaire en maladies infectieuses de Marseille (IHU Méditerranée Infection) and its URMITE department, which was previously funded by the French research networks CNRS and INSERM. And while we’re at it, the author doesn’t seem to understand that chloroquine is not the same as HCQ. Convince me that it exists! Unless completely made-up fraud, there is only one way to explain it: For controls, Daowen et al lied about baseline treatment because serious scientists outside of China tend to laugh at TCM. At the moment we don’t have any treatment that is efficient for covid-19. PS it doesn’t matter if they were in the “control” group or not, they were part of the study. ): Un manuscrit dont la publication devrait faire parler : expérimentation de la bithérapie HCQ+AZ au Brésil. "Jean-Paul Moatti is the husband of Yolande Obadia, who is president of the IHU Mediterranee Infection foundation. The study made all the big news, maybe because it was the first one from the US. He even treated 14 year old children with chloroquine as part of his 1000 patients trial (Table 1 here, recruitment age was >12 years old), which is actually quite illegal. It is all very surreal. I look forward to seeing their paper once it is published. What do they have in common? Scientists understand this, but the media is hoping readers won’t. To be updated, proper randomized controlled clinical trials on chloroquine against COVID-19 are ongoing and might soon deliver results. Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected, you can see where this is going. The blame for thousands, if not millions, of covid-19 deaths will soon become abundantly clear being laid upon these two groups of ideoligists referenced above. Mean through blood concentration of hydroxychloroquine was 678 ng/mL (range: 381–891) at days 3–7 after treatment initiation. The safest way to successfully heal with witchdoctor magic is to treat those who are not really ill and recover anyway. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. The author is a cartoonist. Raoult treats patients who come to IHU-Marseille, therefore statistically more motivated by symptoms than in the Pasteur survey. Meanwhile, in USA, an NIH Expert Panel, convened by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (directed by US epidemics expert Anthony Fauci), recommended in its COVID-19 guidelines on 21 April 2020: “Except in the context of a clinical trial, the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends against the use of the following drugs for the treatment of COVID-19: – The combination of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (AIII) because of the potential for toxicities.”. Where did you hear that? Independent Science Journalist and Cartoonist. Raoult says this is good science. Vous avez trouvé sur notre site internet un contenu ou un message manifestement illicite et/ou portant atteinte à la dignité humaine ? The idea is to kill the virus. Eh? Tide is turning for the media-savvy French professor Didier Raoult and his chloroquine, even US President Donald Trump is suddenly barely even mentioning the miracle drug for COVID-19. In this double-blinded phase IIb clinical trial, all patients were treated just as Raoult says, with hydroxychloroquine+azithromycine only, without those evil controls Raoult hates? Its all the same. En publiant un commentaire vous acceptez la réglementation en vigueur. Just adding for the record that despite his own exclusion criteria Pr Raoult did enroll 10 y/o children, for which there is a 3 years jail sentence + 45k euros fine. This horrendous ethics breach passed peer review at Elsevier with flying colours. Raoult is aping not only Trump’s language of “witchhunting” and “fake news”, but also his deployment of tactical hypocrisy. Who cares, it will sure pass peer review in one of Elsevier journals Raoult controls. 25/02/2020 – “Before we can influence mortality statistics in France, things will have to change a lot” in his “Coronavirus: a risk of pandemic?” video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuE5CA6yB-Y), I could also quote him on his “visions” about the climate but it’s out of his scope of proficiency. And anyway, Raoult and his colleagues “deemed it ethically unacceptable to conduct a therapeutic trial“. Enrolling them if enough to violate the law even if they are part of the control group, since in a normal study groups are randomized and nor the doctors nor the patients know who is in which group. Millions of people have been taking this drug for malaria in the past decades. If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Practically, every country in the world monitors a number of active cases and death associated with COVID-19, and these statistics are updated several times daily. I can’t insert graphics here. On 24 April Raoult and his IHU issued another press release or a white paper, where they openly accused their Paris colleagues Mahevas et al of “scientific fraud“, already in the headline. Wow… from the moment you confuse cloroquine with hydroxycloroquine, everything you have written becomes invalid. excuse me in Greece we do not apply such protocol. Learn how your comment data is processed. However you don’t address the flawed Veterans study that Raoult criticizes, which is way worse than his studies on all points. Are you saying that Raoult is a fraud, Zelenko is a fraud, South Dakota is a fraud, the country of Bahrain is a fraud, along with 1000’s of doctors around the world? ISAC (and then the publisher Elsevier) insist however that the peer review process “did adhere to the industry’s peer review rules.” Which is strange, since it seems the paper was reviewed and sent back for minor revision on the same day it was submitted. 48 of these allegedly received HCQ. La vidéo a été réuploadée par France Soir, vous pouvez la voir à ce lien : sur France Soir n ous allons rapidement la télécharger sur de nouvelles plateformes d’hébergement « . https://t.co/hxZyUjf8vW. De linke weekendbijlage (17-2020) - Kloptdatwel? Jhnny99, with respect, by definition lethality is the capacity to cause death, whereas mortality is the number of deaths from a particular cause. You mentioned above at ” Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected……”. just published a couple of days ago. Bik found even more irregularities in his papers, which makes sense: a bullying and totalitarian research environment with a personality cult, where compliance and fear rule, can only produce unreliable or falsified research. The “great scientist” believes in his delirium to be actually just like a World War I general, commanding thousands of men to get out the trenches and die for the glory of France. Now, the preprint by the Tongji cardiologist Wang Daowen and colleagues claims all 568 patients received “baseline treatments [..] of antiviral drugs (Lopinavir and Ritonavir, Entecavir hydrate, or Ribavirin)“. Didier Raoult a réagi sur Twitter aujourd’hui, jeudi 10 septembre, déclarant : « Mon bulletin scientifique de mardi a été censuré par Youtube, décision confirmée après appel. Is Frontiers a potential predatory publisher? The object of Raoult’s public wrath is now Bik whom he describes as “witchhunter”, as well as this study from Veterans Affair hospitals in USA: Joseph Magagnoli, Siddharth Narendran, Felipe Pereira, Tammy Cummings, James W Hardin, S Scott Sutton, Jayakrishna Ambati Outcomes of hydroxychloroquine usage in United States veterans hospitalized with Covid-19 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920. Its amazing how trite and condescending a human can become. Making huge profit out of this crisis by big pharma and their corrupted allies is the sole motive! Raoult doesn’t talk about that study. Its clearly to early to use data and studies. That was sure something unexpected for Raoult, after the President of France, Emmanuel Macron, has visited his lab just days before and described Raoult as “great scientist”. Avec une confirmation cette fois qu'aucun consentement n'a été demandé. Look at the data please. Control group was treated with azithromycin.Nearly dying patients with lymphopenia were treated with hydroxychloroquine.Fraudulent study. He just healed patients that were showing up at his hospital, he wasn’t in a clinical trial and never was. This page is lying. Vous devez être connecté pour intéragir. In his paper Gautret et al TMID 2020 Raoult admitted that his thousands of patients were kept in the dark about the risks, since none of them received a patient information sheet and an informed consent to sign: “There is no formal consent to sign in our institution by patients“. You mean BFM TV let people think he was a visionary. This article has been updated several times since it was first published. Really, he does: First paper showing a significant effect of hydroxychloroquine on the fatality rate of severe forms of COVID-19.Attenuation of the inflammatory cytokine storm? Well, Let’s look at Costa Rica, and their death rate. You seem to be a great analyst. Les champs marqués d'un « * » sont obligatoires. They gave all patients that were in the most critical state HCQ and then they conclude that HCQ increases deaths. Moreover, this depends on the amount of tests performed, so unreliable. The French newspaper Entreprendre cited his letter to Robert Lafont, the CEO of this publishing house. Enter your email address to follow For Better Science and receive notifications of new posts by email. That study, and a mysterious manuscript from Detroit submitted to NEJM, are discussed by Derek Lowe here. He treated older patients who had clear symptoms, and few were subsequently hospitalized and almost none died. I was indeed recruited as Professor by the Peking University (PUHSC), the most renowned medical school in the country, which happens to be very advanced in the field of virology. We need to prevent the Cytokine storm. Chaque semaine, l’infectiologue s’exprime pendant quelques minutes au sujet de l’épidémie. Period. So now Raoult endorses Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) as a chloroquine adjuvant.

Les Differentes Techniques D'animation Commerciale, Les Occasions Du Lareinty, Vélo Route Cyclotourisme, Star Wars Le Pouvoir De La Force Steam, Oreiller Wopilo Ou Simba, Les Adjectifs Qualificatifs, Cycle De Vie Produit Touristique, Nombre D'habitants Erstein 2020, Hôtel Avec Salle De Réunion, Lac Guichard Rando, Zone Interdite Changer De Vie 2/2 Replay,

En continuant à utiliser le site, vous acceptez l’utilisation des cookies. Plus d’informations

Les paramètres des cookies sur ce site sont définis sur « accepter les cookies » pour vous offrir la meilleure expérience de navigation possible. Si vous continuez à utiliser ce site sans changer vos paramètres de cookies ou si vous cliquez sur "Accepter" ci-dessous, vous consentez à cela.

Fermer